Type C10
|
|
Genuine Handstamp | Type C10 |
The forged handstamp was described by Bartels et al (1904) as Type C59.
Characteristics: The printing is not as clear as the genuine surcharge, all letters appearing somewhat blurred (especially those in black) The extereme end of the foot of the 2 would form a triangle if cut off by a horizontal line running along the top of the heavy base of the numeral – in the genuine surcharge this would be a short vertical line instead of a triangle the period after the date in the genuine is exactly under the vertical right line of the inner rectangle, while in the counterfeit it is to the right (the vertical here clips the corner of 7). The line of the outer frame is too heavy through-out. This forgery emananted from Spain in 1901. |
#F-174A Type C10 blue on 20c grey brown |
#F-174A Type C10 black on 20c grey brown |
#F-174A C10 blue Bartels et al (1904) describes this forgery: C07-1
|
#F-174A C10 black Bartels et al (1904) describes this forgery: C05-1 Also occurs inverted |
#F-175 Type C10 black on 20c dark violet |
#F-177 Type C10 black on 25c brown |
#F-175 C10 black Bartels et al (1904) describes this forgery: C258-2 |
#F-177 C10 black Bartels et al (1904) describes this forgery: C259-2 |
Babyheads
Surcharges
Overprints
Essays